The Corporate Culture Between the Public and the Private Sectors

The foundations to fig out alliances personnel be antithetical mingled with the macrocosm and the common soldier sectors. These may also be different from one country to an some other or from one fraternity to another consort to the fundamental law, the context of evolution and its environment. And from these foundations and values that be shared by all staff, a integrated close is set. The corporate gloss is a key variable to inform the daily life and strategic choices do by a social group. The corporate refinement is in a sense, a product of national culture and indeed a set of values and signs shared by the majority of employees.Seen from the out incline, all companies in a country are same workshops, warehouses, offices, constant movements of people and goods. Yet a detailed examination shows that no company is comparable to another, especially betwixt unrestricted sector and surreptitious one, On the one hand thither are for interpreter statutes, enlis ting through entrance exams and the machine-controlled nature of salaries, and charm on the other hand, there are for instance task laws, individual goals expressed through contracts and the license to set pay scales, so from all(prenominal) one has its own personality, has a unique personal identity and image.This personality is forged around quintuple themes the status, recruitment, remuneration, the mindset of management and the environment in which the firm directs. One can discern for example between a reality sector company impudence maladie and a private company axa. Both operate in the same category of activity, arrogance maladie staff does not enjoy oppose reassuring status than axa staff, the civil handmaiden status is more securing than employee status.Even their recruitment are not the same, in the public sector recruitment is often through with(p) by concours what is not the shell in the private sector. Another deference between the two sectors is shown in the system of remuneration, the last mentioned is fixed by the state accord to a pay scale with presumption maladie while in axa is set establish on skills and level of responsibility added to motivations by objective system that is not the case in the private sector. The personality of a company also reflects the personality f its leaders, at axa, it is CEO who has a hygienic influence on the culture that the company wants to pass through goal linguistic context and strategy of development. In assurance maladie regular(a) if it is managed by the state, each individual try outs to execute his need to belong without being dependent on the culture instilled by the state. In addition the public status of assurance maladie requires that it must be transparent active its economic, financial or social short letter which is not always the case with private businesses as axa.This lack of transparency fetter private company to suggest a human resources strategy that will se ek to reconcile the interests of the company and the employees for a social peace, in order to show workers that they choose an important place and an opportunity of promotion so they keep their motivation. The corporate culture is like a collection of complexes allowing each individual to identify with their organization. Facing an seismal environment and increasingly complex, firms seek to ascension their human potential. The corporate culture seems to be a response to develop this potential. only when we can still consider the serving of these concerns. The corporate culture, as strong as it is not eternal. Indeed the downsizing impose to axa staff caused a sharp unbelieving of the culture because axa is shown as Paternalist Company that guarantee lifetime employment and high wages. If there there s deference between axa corporate culture and assurance maladie culture is that it is also due to the model on which both businesses found, on one side axa being a private co mpany that seeks to generate benefits inherited the U.S. management , in the other side model so that assurance maladie it follows the French model. The logical useable of American corporate culture is based on earnings so its organization is perceived primarily as a system of tasks, functions to perform and goals to achieve while in the business culture in France, the organization is designed primarily as a social system involving a community of people.